The Approaches of The Contracting Companies to The Housing Landscape in Konya Province

Bahadır Ekici, Ahmet Tuğrul Polat

Abstract


Today's residences show highly functional and qualified formations and offer many functions to their users. One of the most important factors that increase the housing function and aesthetics is the housing landscape. In this study; the opinions and experiences of the contractor companies that have implemented housing projects in line with the supply and demands of the users have been determined. A survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews with 97 house producer company officials affiliated to Konya Contractors Association. In the first part of the questionnaire, the approaches to projecting the housing landscape and the factors that affect the project process are questioned. In the second part, landscape application approaches, various professional groups in the application stages, quality and characteristics of the application are presented. In the third section, the economic and financial evaluations of the residential landscape are made and the values that the landscape adds to the housing through projects and applications are determined. In the last part of the questionnaire, the satisfaction levels of the contractors and their customers were measured based on the experience of the contractors. According to the findings; 89 out of 97 company officials show a positive approach to constructing landscape projects. In addition, 49 company officials stated that the effectiveness of the landscape in housing prices is high and very high.

Keywords


Housing, Residential landscape, Landscape project, Landscape applications, Contractor company

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bayraktar, E., 2007, Bir İnsanlık Hakkı Konut, İstan-bul, Boyut Yayıncılık, p.

Broto, C., 2000, Residential Architecture, Barcelona, p. 9.

Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G. ve Stone, A. M., 1992, Public Space, New York, Cambridge Univer-sity Press, p.

Chiesura, A., 2004, The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68 (1), 129-138.

Çınar, S., 2008, Ev Bahçesinde Peyzaj Tasarımı Sü-reci, İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 58 (1), 73-90.

Edwards, B., Sibley, M., Hakmi, M. ve Land, P., 2005, Courtyard Housing, New York, Taylor & Francis, p. 297.

Gül, A. ve Küçük, V., 2001, Kentsel Açik-Yeşil Alanlar Ve Isparta Kenti Örneğinde İrdelenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 27-48.

Gül, G., 2012, gayrimenkul yatırımcısı inşaat firma-larında konut pazarlama yönetimi süreci, Yüksek Lisans, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Keleş, R., 2008, Kentleşme politikası, Ankara, İmge Kitabevi, p.

Kırgızoğlu, M. I., 1995, Peyzaj Kavramı ve Şehir Plan-lamasında Kullanımı, Erzurum, Atatürk Üniversi-tesi Ziraat Fakültesi, p. 1.

Newbold, P., 1995, Statistics for Business and Econom-ics. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 867 p.

Per, A. F., Mozas, J. ve Ollero, A. S., 2013, 10 Stories of Collective Housing, Spain, a+t architecture publish-ers, p.

Polat, A. T. ve Önder, S., 2012, Kentsel Peyzaj: Tasarım Ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Bazı Öneriler, Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, 97-116.

Sherer, P. M., 2003, Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space, The Trust For Public Land, 1-32.

Şişman, E. E., Korkut, A. B. ve Etli, B., 2008, Tekirdağ Valiliği Tören ve Park Alanı Peyzaj Tasarım Süreci, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (2), 119-129.

Smith, C., Clayden, A. ve Dunnett, N., 2008, Residen-tial Landscape Sustainability, United Kingdom, Blackwell Publishing, p. 4.

Song, S., Fang, C., Li, R. ve Gao, A., 2011, Residential Landscape, China, Liaoning Science&Technology Publishing Hause, p.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2019.170

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.