Identifying Preferences of Red Meat Consumption by Means of Conjoint Analysis

Aykut Özüak, İsmail Keskin

Abstract


In this study, in order to identify the preferences of red meat consumption in Konya, conjoint analysis was used, which has been quite commonly used in product production and existing market studies. Preference cards used in the study were applied to 201 people. People were asked to put in order preference cards by coding as “1” the one they prefer the most  toward they prefer the least, and  method of diagnosis profile was used. 

Kendall’s Tau value stating representation power of the model was identified as 0.974 and Pearson's R, as 0.993. At the end of the study, it was seen that the factors affecting red meat preferences and purchasing behaviors of the people living in Konya were purchasing place (46.5%),  sort of meat (17.7%),  purchasing way (13.0%),  fat rate of the meat  purchased (12.9%) and, finally, meat price. 

As a result, it was expressed that conjoint analysis would help about which changes businesses could make in their products or services, which points they  had to be dealt with product development studies, and in what direction the existing and potential customers in market could react.


Keywords


Conjoint, Red meat, Preference, Orthogonal plan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arısoy, H., Bayramoğlu, Z., 2015. Consumers’ Deter-mination of Red Meat and Meat Products Purchase Behaviour – City of Ankara Sample. Turkish Jour-nal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 3(1): 28-34.

Cengiz, E., 2009. Investigation of Product Origin, Brand, Price and Quality Variables Playing a Role in Consumers' Product Choice. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 23 (2): 155-174.

Ekinci, M.G., 2018. Red Meat Consumption. Göller Bölgesi Aylık Hakemli Ekonomi ve Kültür Dergisi Ayrıntı, 5 (61): 21-24.

Kibar, M., Mikail, N., Yılmaz, A., 2019. Red Meat Consumption Habits and Affecting Factors in Cen-tral District of Siirt Province. Turkish Journal of Ag-ricultural and Natural Sciences, 6(4): 720–728.

Kibar M., Mikail N., 2018. Application of conjoint analysis to determine consumers’ red meat prefer-ences in Siirt province. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, LXI (1): 303-306.

Newbold, P., 1995. Statistics for Business and Econom-ics. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 867 p.

Saraçlı, S., 2004. Conjoint Analysis in Researching Customers' Preferences and an Application to Indi-vidual Retirement Account. Anadolu University Social Sciences Institute, (Master Thesis), Eskişehir.

Tatlıdil, H., 1995. Conjoint Analysis (Unpublished Lecture Notes). Hacettepe University, Department of Statistics, Ankara.

Turanlı, M., Cengiz, D.T., Işık, M., 2013. Determining the Factors Affecting Newspaper Preferences with Conjoint Analysis. Istanbul University Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 19: 1-26.

TUIK, 2019. (http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist) (Date of access: 28.09.2019).

Yalnız, A., Bilen, L., 1997. Consumer Choice with Conjoint Analysis in Kasko Insurances. Hazine Dergisi, 8: 53-70.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2020.223

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.