Determination of the Seedling Reactions of Some Two-Rowed Barley Landraces Maintained at Osman Tosun Gene Bank to Pyrenophora teres f. teres

Awet Araya, Aziz Karakaya, Arzu Çelik Oğuz, Güray Akdoğan

Abstract


Seedling stage reactions of thirty-eight 2-rowed barley landraces representing different areas of Turkey obtained from Osman Tosun Gene Bank to two Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates were evaluated. In addition, barley cultivars Bülbül 89 and Avcı 2002 were included. Landraces exhibited different reactions to the disease and their reactions ranged from resistant- moderately resistant to susceptible. Landrace number 33 obtained from Diyarbakır was found the most resistant to the disease compared to all other landraces whereas landrace number 10 obtained from Bilecik-Söğüt, and cultivar Bülbül 89 were the most susceptible. The majority of the landraces were classified between the Moderately Resistant-Moderately Susceptible to Moderately Susceptible-Susceptible. Landrace number 33 exhibited Resistant-Moderately Resistant reactions to both isolates. This landrace from Diyarbakır could be used as the seed source and in the breeding studies for obtaining barley cultivars resistant to the net form of net blotch disease.


Keywords


Barley; Barley landraces; Drechslera teres f. teres; Disease resistance; Net blotch; ;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktaş H (1995). Reactions of Turkish and German barley varieties and lines to the virulent strain T4 of Pyrenophora teres. Rachis 14 (1/2): 9-13.

Attene G, Ceccarelli S and Papa R (1996). The barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) of Sardinia, Italy. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 43: 385–393.

Brush SB (1995). In situ conservation of landraces in centre of crop diversity. Crop Science, 35: 346-354.

Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Tutwiler R, Baha J, Martini AM and Goodchild H, Michael M (2000). A methodo-logical study on participatory barley breeding. I. Se-lection phase. Euphytica, 111: 91–104.

Ceccarelli S and Grando S (2000). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent. A lesson for plant breed-ers. In: S B Brush (Ed.), Genes in the field, On-farm conservation of crop diversity. Int. Plant Gen. Res. Institute, International Development Research Center, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. pp. 51-76.

Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Mert Z (2014). Morphological and pathological variation detected among Turkish isolates of Drechslera teres. IWBLD – 1st Interna-tional Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, Salso-maggiore Terme, Italy, June 3-6, 2014.

Çelik E and Karakaya A (2015). Eskişehir ili arpa ekim alanlarında görülen fungal yaprak ve başak hasta-lıklarının görülme sıklıklarının ve yoğunluklarının belirlenmesi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 55(2): 157-170.

Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Mert Z, Aydın G, Peşkircioğlu H, Tutluer İ, Sağel Z (2016). Seedling response of gamma ray induced advanced barley lines to three isolates of Drechslera teres f teres. Works of the Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Univer-sity of Sarajevo, Vol. LXI, 66/1: 240-243.

Çelik OA and Karakaya A (2017). Pathotypes of Py-renophora teres on barley in Turkey. Phytopatho-logia Mediterranea, 56: 224−234.

Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Ergün N and Sayim İ (2017). Turkish barley landraces resistant to net and spot forms of Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathologia Me-diterranea, 56: 217−223.

Çelik OA, Ölmez F and Karakaya A (2018). Mating type idiomorphs of Pyrenophora teres in Tur-key. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 105(3):271-278.

Çelik OA, Ölmez F and Karakaya A (2019a). Genetic diversity of net blotch pathogens of barley in Tur-key. International Journal of Agriculture and Bio-logy 21:1089-1096.

Çelik OA, Rahimi A and Karakaya A (2019b). Seedling response of Iranian barley landraces to Pyrenopho-ra teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25: 86-92.

Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Duran RM, Özbek K (2019c). Identification of Hordeum spontaneum genotypes resistant to net blotch disease. Tarım Bilimleri Der-gisi 25:115-122.

Damgacı E (2014). Arpa ağbenek (Pyrenophora teres Drechs.) hastalığının yayılış durumu, neden olduğu verim kaybı ve verim bileşenlerine etkisi üzerinde araştırmalar. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 54(4):311-341.

Douiyssi A, Rasmusson DC and Roelfs AP (1998). Responses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Disease, 82: 316-321.

Ergün N, Aydoğan S, Sayim İ, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2017). Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) köy çeşit-lerinde tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerin incelenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma En-stitüsü Dergisi 26(2): 180-189.

Ertürk H, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2018). Leaf dise-ases occurring on barley plants in Bala district of Ankara province, Turkey. Ecological Life Sciences 13(4):204-207.

FAO (2015). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (Access date: 15.12.2016).

FAO (2019). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (Access date: 29.07.2021).

Frankel OH and Hawkes JG (1975). Crop Genetic Re-sources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge.

Geçit HH (2016). Serin İklim Tahılları (Buğday, Arpa, Yulaf, Triticale). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 1640, Ankara.

İlgen MZ, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2017). Leaf diseases occurring on barley and wheat fields in Çubuk district of Ankara, Turkey. Works of the Fa-culty of Agriculture and Food Sciences University of Sarajevo. Vol. XLII, 67/2: 210-215.

Jordan VW and Allen E (1984). Barley net blotch: influence of straw disposal and cultivation methods on inoculum potential, and on incidence and severi-ty of autumn disease. Plant Pathology 33, 547–559.

Karakaya A, Katırcıoğlu YZ and Aktaş H (2004). Studies on the biology of Drechslera teres under Ankara conditions. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 10 (2):133-135.

Karakaya A, Mert Z, Çelik OA, Azamparsa MR, Çelik E, Akan K and Çetin L (2014). Current status of scald and net blotch diseases of barley in Turkey. IWBLD – 1st International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, SalsomaggioreTerme, Italy, June 3-6, 2014.

Legge WG, Metcalfe DR, Chiko AW, Martens JW and Tekauz A (1996). Reaction of Turkish barley ac-cessions to Canadian barley pathogens. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76: 927–931.

Kün E (1996). Tahıllar I (Serin İklim Tahılları). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 1451. Ankara. 332 pp.

Liu Z, Elwood S R, Oliver R P and Friesen T L (2011). Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly dam-aging barley pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology, 12: 1-19.

Mathre DE (Ed.) (1982). Compendium of barley dis-eases. APS Press. Minnesota, 78 pp.

McLean MS, Howlett BJ, Turkington, TK, Platz GL and Hollaway GJ (2012). Spot form of net blotch resistance in a diverse set of barley lines in Australia and Canada. Plant Disease 96: 569-576.

Newton AC, Akar T, Baresel JP, Bebeli PJ, Bettencourt E, Bladenopoulos KV, Czembor JH, Fasoula DA, Katsiotis A, Koutis K, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Kovacs G, Larsson H, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA, Rubiales D, Russell J, Dos Santos TMM and Vaz Patto MC (2010). Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30(2): 237-269.

Olvång H (1988). Sensitivity of Drechslera teres and Septoria nodorum to sterol-biosynthesis inhibitors. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 94, 57–68.

Özdemir HY, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2017). Kırıkkale ilinde buğday ve arpa ekim alan-larında görülen fungal yaprak hastalıklarının belir-lenmesi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni. 57 (2): 89-112.

Saraç I, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2019). Elazığ ilin-de arpalarda görülen yaprak hastalıkları. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 28 (1): 1-6.

Sivrikaya IS, Karakaya A and Çelik OA (2020). De-termination of the barley diseases in Bingöl provin-ce of Turkey. In: Brka M., Omanović-Mikličanin E., Karić L., Falan V., Toroman A. (eds) 30th Scien-tific-Experts Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry. AgriConf 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 78. Springer, Cham

Tekauz A (1985). A numerical scale to classify reac-tions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 7: 181-183.

TUIK (2016). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Türkiye’de arpa üretimi https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel. Zul. (Access date: 29.12.2016).

TUIK (2020). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Türkiye’de arpa üretimi https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr (Access date: 27.05.2021).

Yazıcı B, Karakaya A, Çelik OA and Mert Z (2015). Determination of the seedling reactions of some barley cultivars to Drechslera teres f. teres. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 55(3): 239-245.

Yitbarek S, Berhane L, Fikadu A, Van Leur JAG, Grando S and Ceccarelli S (1998). Variation in Ethiopian barley landrace populations for re-sistance to barley leaf scald and net blotch. Plant Breeding 117, 419–423.

Zadoks JC, Chang TT and Konzak CF (1974). A deci-mal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.004

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.