Determination of Morphological Characteristics of Some Prominent Tomato Genotypes

Necibe Kayak, Gülbanu Kıymacı, Ünal Kal, Yeşim Dal, Önder Türkmen

Abstract


This study was carried out to determine some morphological characteristics of 94 tomato genotypes at the S4 level and to reveal the relationships between these materials. In the study, leaf attitude, leaf length, leaf width, number of flowers, fruit color, fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, the thickness of pericarp, fruit shape, fruit diameter, number of locules,  and total soluble solid content (TTSC) were measured and observed in these genotypes. As a result of the  phenotypic assessment, the maximum fruit weight values of the genotypes were observed as in G9 (317.59 g), G54 (310 g), G92 (292.85 g), G70 (287.01 g), and G110 (276.66 g); and the lowest fruit weight values were observed in G26 (18.302 g) and G8 (14.48 g).  Average fruit length, fruit width, pericarp thickness, and the number of carpels were recorded (69.09 mm, 56.90 mm, 6.37 mm, and 4 carpels respectively). Tomato genotypes were also investigated using Cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method based on these measurements and observations. As a result of this analysis, five independent principal component axes were obtained. While these axes represent 69.28% of the total variation, the eigen values were ranged between 1.06 and 4.02. According to the PCA analysis results, genotypes G7, G81, G93, and G103 were prominent in terms of leaf length, fruit width, fruit weight, and carpel number parameters. Based on TSSC results, the G65 genotype was found to be the most prominent one, and the genotypes G12 and G114  exhibit promising results for fruit color.  A high degree of morphological variation was detected among tomato genotypes.

Keywords


Tomato, Genetic resources, PCA, Morphological characterization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altıntaş S, Polat S and Şahin N (2016). Marmara Böl-gesi'nden Toplanan Domates Popülasyonlarının Moleküler ve Morfolojik Karakterizasyonunun Be-lirlenmesi. (B. B. Bölümü, ed.), NKU.BAP.00.24.AR.14.22.

Ayyıldız M (2017). Domates ıslahında nitelikli saf hatlarda morfolojik karakterizasyon ve heterotik etkilerin belirlenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilim-leri Enstitüsü.

Bernousi I, Emami A, Tajbakhsh M, Darvishzadeh R and Henareh M (2011). Studies on Genetic Varia-bility and Correlation among the Different Traits in Solanum lycopersicum L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39, 152-158.

Bhattarai K, Sharma S and Panthee DR (2018). Diver-sity among Modern Tomato Genotypes at Differ-ent Levels in Fresh-Market Breeding. Hindawi Pub-lishing Corporation International Journal of Agronomy, 15.

Bota J, Conesa MÀ, Ochogavia JM, Medrano H, Fran-cis DM and Cifre J (2014). Characterization of a landrace collection for Tomàtiga de Ramellet (So-lanum lycopersicum L.) from the Balearic Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61, 1131-1146.

Çukadar K and Dursun A (2012). Erzincan ili Domates Genotiplerinin Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu. In "9. Ulusal Sebze Sempozyumu Konya" (P. D. Ö. Tü-rkmen, R. A. S. Sabır and U. M. Seymen, eds.), pp. 116-124.

Danin-Poleg Y and Reis N (2001). Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Cu-cumis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics Genetics 102, 61-72.

Evgenidis G, Traka-Mavrona E and Koutsika-Sotiriou M (2011). Principal Component and Cluster Analy-sis as a Tool in the Assessment of Tomato Hybrids and Cultivars. International Journal of Agronomy 2011, 7.

FAO (2019).http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

Figàs MR, Prohens J, Raigón MD, Fernández-de-Córdova P, Fita A and Soler S (2014). Characteri-zation of a collection of local varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using conventional de-scriptors and the high-throughput phenomics tool Tomato Analyzer. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62, 189-204.

Gözen V (2008). Hıyarda (Cucumis sativus L.) örtüaltı yetiştiriciliğine uygun hibrit çeşit ıslahında morfolo-jik karakterizasyon, hibrit kombinasyonları ile hibrit tohum verim ve kalitesinin belirlenmesi, An-kara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Henareh M, Dursun A and Mandoulakani BA (2015). Genetic diversity in tomato landraces collected from Turkey and Iran revealed by morphological character. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14, 87-96.

Jenkins JA (1948). The origin of the cultivated tomato. Econ. Bot. 2, 379-392.

Jin L, Zhao L, Wang Y, Zhou R, Song L, Xu L, Cui X, Li R, Yu W and Zhao T (2019). Genetic diversity of 324 cultivated tomato germplasm resources using agronomic traits and InDel markers. Euphytica 215.

Kal Ü, Kayak N, Kıymacı G, Dal Y, Seymen M, Turk-men Ö and Kurtar ES (2020). Some Morphological Properties of Qualified Tomato Inbred Lines And Principal Component Analysis of the Relationship Between These Properties. In "IV. International Eurasian Agriculture and Natural Sciences Con-gress", Online.

Kaloo D (1988). Vegetable Breeding. CRC Pres Inc Boca Raton 1.

Karaağaç O and Balkaya A (2010). Bafra Kırmızı Biber Populasyonları (Capsicum annuum L. var. conoides (Mill.) Irish) Tanımlanması Ve Mevcut Varyasyonun Değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 25, 10-20.

Kathayat K, Singh A and Rawat M (2015). Mor-phologıcal characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) germplasm in tarai region of utta-rakhand. Hort Flora Research Spectrum 4, 220-223.

Kavitha P, Shivashankara KS, Rao VK, Sadashiva AT, Ravishankar KV and Sathish GJ (2014). Genotypic variability for antioxidant and quality parameters among tomato cultivars, hybrids, cherry tomatoes and wild species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 993-999.

Keskin L (2014). Bazı Domates (Solanum lycopersi-cum) Genotiplerinin Melezlenmesi, Ebeveyn ve Melezlerin Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Kouam EB, Dongmo JR and Djeugap JF (2018). Ex-ploring morphological variation in tomato (Sola-num lycopersicum): A combined study of disease resistance, genetic divergence and association of characters. 51 2, 71-82.

Krishna B, J LF, D WJ and R PD (2016). Diversity analysis of tomato genotypes based on morpholog-ical traits with commercial breeding significance for fresh market production in eastern USA. Australian Journal of Crop Science 10.

Kurt T (2019). Yerel domates genotiplerinin sele-ksiyonu ve morfolojik karakterizasyonu, Tokat Gazi Osman Paşa Üniversitesi.

Mohammadi SA and Prasanna BM (2003). Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Crop Plants—Salient Statis-tical Tools and Considerations. Crop Sci 43, 1235-1248.

Mutlu S, Kır A, Haytaoğlu MA, Küçük SA, Balkan C and İçer B (2007). Sebze genetik kaynakları araştırma projesi sonuç raporu. ETAE, Menemen, İzmir.

Oğuz A (2010). Bazı yerel domates genotiplerinde farklı yöntemler kullanarak domates lekeli solgun-luk virüsü (tomato spotted wilt virüs=TSMV)’nde dayanıklığın ve genetik varyasyonların araştırıl-ması, Ankara Üniversitesi.

Özdamar K (2004). "Paket Programlar ile İstatiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler)," Kaan Kitapevi.

Peralta IE, Spooner DM and Knapp S (2008). Taxon-omy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Ly-copersicon; Solanaceae). Am. Soc. Plant Taxono-mists 151-160.

Sacco A, Ruggieri V, Parisi M, Festa G, Rigano MM, Picarella ME, Mazzucato A and Barone A (2015). Exploring a Tomato Landraces Collection for Fruit-Related Traits by the Aid of a High-Throughput Genomic Platform. Plos One 10.

Salim MMR, Rashid MH, Hossain MM and Zakaria M (2020). Morphological characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 19, 233-240.

Seymen, M., Yavuz, D., Dursun, A., Kurtar, E. S., and Türkmen, Ö. (2019). Identification of drought-tolerant pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) genotypes associated with certain fruit characteristics, seed yield, and quality. Agricultural Water Management 221, 150-159.

Singh, B., and Goswami, A. (2015). Morphological and molecular characterization of tomato (Lycopersi-cum esculentum Mill) genotypes. Vegetos-An Inter-national Journal of Plant Research 28, 67-75.

Sönmez, K., Asu, O., Özdamar, K., and Ellİaltioğlu, Ş. (2015). Bazı yerel sofralık domates genotiplerinin morfolojik ve fenolojik olarak akrabalık de-recelerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 25, 24-40.

Tahtalı, Y. (2005). Gen dizilerinde temel bileşenler analizinin uygulanması, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Zootekni Anabilim Dalı.

Terzopoulos, P., and Bebeli, P. (2010). Phenotypic diversity in Greek tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Scientia horticulturae 126, 138-144.

UPOV (2013). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability: Tomato (TG/44/11 Rev.). International Union for the Pro-tection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.

Yavuz D, Seymen M, Süheri S, Yavuz N, Türkmen Ö and Kurtar ES (2020). How do rootstocks of citron watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) affect the yield and quality of watermelon under deficit ir-rigation? Agricultural Water Management 241, 106351.

Yesmin L, Islam MS, Rahman MM, Uddın MN and Ahmad S (2014). Inbred and hybrid seed produc-tion potentiality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculen-tum) genotypes and their yield performance during summer. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 39, 13-21.

Zhou R, Wu Z, Cao X and Jiang F (2015). Genetic diversity of cultivated and wild tomatoes revealed by morphological traits and SSR markers. Genet. Mol. Res 14, 13868-13879.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.015

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.