Determination of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) of Cotton Cultivation in Batman Province: A Case Study from Beşiri District

Mehmet Fırat Baran, Osman Gökdoğan

Abstract


In this research, the energy use efficiency (EUE) and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of cotton cultivation in Beşiri district of Batman province in Turkey were determined. This research was conducted through face-to-face surveys with 64 farms selected by simple random sampling method in the 2018-2019 cultivation season. The energy input (EI) and energy output (EO) in cotton cultivation were calculated as 52,302.62 MJ/ha and 60,341.03 MJ/ha. Energy inputs consist of electricity energy with 19,948.86 MJ/ha(38.14%), chemical fertilizers energy with 14,163.83 MJ/ha (27.08%), diesel fuel energy with 13,218.49 (25.27%), irrigation water energy with 2563.79 MJ/ha(4.90%), machinery energy with 1071.14 MJ/ha(2.05%), chemicals energy with 797.96 MJ/ha (1.53%), seed energy with 291.46 MJ/ha (0.56%) and human labour energy with 247.09 MJ/ha(0.47%), respectively. Total energy inputs in cotton cultivation can be categorized as 68.79% direct, 31.21% indirect, 5.93% renewable and 94.07% non-renewable. EUE, specific energy (SE), energy productivity (EP) and net energy (NE) in cotton cultivation were calculated as 1.15, 10.23 MJ/kg, 0.10 kg /MJ and 8038.41 MJ/ ha, respectively. Total GHG was calculated as 3742.59 kgCO2-eq ha-1 for cotton cultivation with the greatest share taken by nitrogen (26.19%). Nitrogen was followed by electricity (24.73%), irrigation water (18.48%), diesel fuel (17.31%), seed (5.04%), chemicals (2.93%), phosphorous (2.74%), human labour (2.36%), potassium (0.19%) and machinery (0.03%), respectively. GHG ratio value was calculated as 0.73 kgCO2-eq kg-1 in cotton cultivation.

Keywords


Energy ratio, Cotton, GHG ratio, Specific energy (SE), Turkey

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afzalinia S (2020). Tillage effects on energy use and green-house gas emission in wheat-cotton rotation. Iran Agricul-tural Research 39(1):13-24

Akdemir S, Calavaris C, Gemtos T (2017). Energy balance of sunflower production. Agronomy Research 15(4):1463-1473

Anonym (2019). T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı, Esnaf, Sanatkârlar ve Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlüğü. 2018 Yılı Pamuk Raporu.https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5d41e59913b87639ac9e02e8/d0e2b9c79234684ad29baf256a0e7dce.pdf Nisan 2019 Accessed 06 Apr 2022

Anonym (2022a). T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı, TEPGE. Tarım Ürünleri Piyasaları, Pamuk (Dr. Tijen Özüdoğru) https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge/Belgeler/PDF%20Tar%C4%B1m%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCnleri%20Piyasalar%C4%B1/2022-Ocak%20Tar%C4%B1m%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCnleri%20Rapor%C4%B1/Pamuk,%20Ocak-2022%20Tar%C4%B1m%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCnleri%20Piyasa%20Raporu--+.pdf Accessed 06 Apr 2022

Anonym (2022b). T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, Batman İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü.https://batman.ktb.gov.tr/TR-56576/cografya.html Accessed: 05 Apr 2022

Anonym (2022c). T.C. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. Dicle Kalkınma Ajansı https://www.dika.org.tr/batman/ilceler/sanayi-ve-tarimin-merkezi-besiri Accessed: 05 Apr 2022

Banaeian N, Omid M, Ahmadi H (2011). Energy and econom-ic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in Tehran province of İran. Energy Conversion & Management 52:1020-1025

Baran MF, Gökdoğan O, Karaağaç HA (2014). Kanola üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi (Kırklareli İli Örneği). Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 1(3):331-337 (in Turkish)

Baran MF, Gokdogan O (2015). Determination of energy input-output of tobacco production in Turkey. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 15(7):1346-1350

Baran MF, Gokdogan O (2016). Determination of energy balance of sugar beet production in Turkey: a case study of Kırklareli Province. Energy Efficiency 9(2): 487-494

Baran MF, Polat R, Gokdogan O (2016). Comparison of energy use efficiency of different tillage methods on the secondary crop sunflower production. Fresenius Environ-mental Bulletin 25(11):4937-4943

Baran MF, Gökdoğan O, Yilmaz Y (2021). Determination of energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of cotton cultivation in Turkey: A case study from Bismil dis-trict of Diyarbakır province. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18(2):322-332

Bayhan Y (2016). İkinci ürün ayçiçeği üretiminde farklı toprak işleme ve doğrudan ekim yöntemlerinin enerji kullanım etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 13(2):102-109 (in Turkish)

BioGrace-II (2015). Harmonised calculations of biofuel green-house gas emissions in Europe. BioGrace, Utrecht, The Netherlands. http://www.biograce.net

Canakci M, Akinci I (2006). Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy 31:1243-56

Clark S, Khoshnevisan B, Sefeedpari P (2016). Energy effi-ciency and greenhouse gas emissions during transition to organic and reduced-input practices: Student farm case study. Ecological Engineering 88:186-194

Çiçek A, Erkan O (1996). Tarım Ekonomisinde Araştırma ve Örnekleme Yöntemleri. Gaziosmanpaşa Universitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No:12, Ders Notları Serisi No:6, Tokat, Türkiye (in Turkish)

Dagistan E, Akcaoz H, Demirtas B, Yilmaz Y (2009). Energy usage and benefit-cost analysis of cotton production in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(7):599-604

Demirbas A, Urkmez A (2006). Biomass-based combined heat and power systems. Energy Source, Part B - Economics, Planning and Policy 1(3):245-253

Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener HM, Akbolat D, Ekinci C (2006). Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: a case study from Isparta province. Energy Conversion Management 47:1761-1769

Ekinci K (2011). Utilization of apple pruning residues as a source of biomass energy: A case study in Isparta prov-ince. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 29(1):87-107

Erdal G, Esengun K, Erdal H, Gunduz O (2007). Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32:35-41

Eren O, Gokdogan O, Baran MF (2019). Determination of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the production of dif-ferent plants in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 28(2A):1158-1166

Gokdogan O, Bagdatli MC, Erdogan O (2018). The determi-nation with geographic information systems (GIS) map-ping of the energy use efficiency of potato production are-as in Turkey: A study in Nevsehir province. Fresenius En-vironmental Bulletin 27(12A):8917-8927

Gökdoğan O, Erdoğan, O (2021) .Determining the Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in olive farming. European Journal of Science and Technology (23):717-724

Guzman GI, Alonso AM (2008). A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agricultural Systems 98:167-176

Hacıseferoğulları H, Acaroğlu M, Gezer İ (2003). Determina-tion of the energy balance of the sugar beet plant. Energy Sources 25:15-22

Houshyar E, Dalgaard T, Tarazgar MH, Jorgensen U (2015). Energy input for tomato production what economy says, and what is good for the environment. Journal of Cleaner Production 89:99-109

Hughes DJ, West JS, Atkins SD, Gladders P, Jeger MJ, Fitt BD (2011). Effects of disease control by fungicides on greenhouse gas emissions by U.K. arable crop production. Pest Manag Sci 67:1082-1092.

ICAC (2021). International Cotton Advisory Committee. Cotton World Statistics, Nov 2021

Karaağaç HA, Aykanat S, Çakır B, Eren Ö, Turgut MM, Barut ZB, Öztürk HH (2011). Energy balance of wheat and maize crops production in Hacıali undertaking. 11th Inter-national Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agri-culture Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 21-23 September, 388-391

Karaağaç HA, Baran MF, Mart D, Bolat A, Eren Ö (2019). Nohut üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliği ve sera gazı (GHG) emisyonunun belirlenmesi (Adana ili örneği). Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi (16):41-50 (in Turkish)

Kazemi H, Shokrgozar M, Kamkar B, Soltani A (2018). Anal-ysis of cotton production by energy indicators in two dif-ferent climatic regions. Journal of Cleaner Production 190:729-736

Khan MA, Khan S, Mushtaq (2009). Energy and economic efficiency analysis of rice and cotton production in China. Sarhad J. Agric. 25(2):291-300

Khoshnevisan B, Shariati HM, Rafiee S, Mousazadeh H (2014). Comparison of energy con-sumption and GHG emissions of open field and greenhouse strawberry pro-duction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29:316-324

Kizilaslan H (2009). Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat province of Turkey. Applied Energy 86:1354-1358

Koctürk OM, Engindeniz S (2009). Energy and cost analysis of sultana grape growing: A case study of Manisa, west Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(10):938-943

Kousar R, Makhdum MSA, Yaqoob S, Saghir A (2006). Economics of energy use in cotton production on small farms in district Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Ag-riculture & Social Sciences 2(4):219-221

Lal R (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Envi-ronment International 30:981-990

Loghmanpour-zarini R, Abedi-firouzjaee R (2013). Energy and water use indexes for tobacco production under differ-ent irrigation systems in Iran. International Journal of Ag-riculture and Crop Sciences 5(12):1332-1339

Mandal KG, Saha KP, Ghosh PK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK (2002). Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23:337-345

Mani I, Kumar P, Panwar JS, Kant K (2007). Variation in energy consumption in production of wheat-maize with varying altitudes in hill regions of Himachal Prades. India Energy 32:2336-2339

Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion Management 49:3566-3570

Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Rafiee H (2010). Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of ki-wifruit production in Iran. Renewable Energy 35:1071-1075

Moraditochaee M (2012). Study energy indices of tobacco production in north of Iran. Agricultural and Biological Science 7(6):462-465

Mujeebu MA, Jayaraj S, Ashok S, Abdullah MZ, Khalil M (2009a). Feasibility study of cogeneration in a plywood industry with power export to grid. Applied Energy 86(5):657-662

Mujeebu MA, Abdullah MZ, Ashok S (2009b). Viability of biomass fueled steam turbine cogeneration with power ex-port for an Asian plywood industry. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 27(3):213-224

Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE (2012). System expansion for handling co-products in LCA of sugar cane bio-energy systems: GHG consequences of using molasses for etha-nol production. Applied Energy 89:254-261.

Oren MN, Ozturk HH (2006). An analysis of energy utiliza-tion for sustainable wheat and cotton production in South-eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 29(1):119-130

Ozalp A, Yilmaz S, Ertekin C, Yilmaz I (2018). Energy analy-sis and emissions of greenhouse gases of pomegranate production in Antalya province of Turkey. Erwerbs Ob-stbau 60(4):321-329

Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Karadeniz F (2003). Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. En-ergy Conversion and Management 45(11-12):1821-1830

Ozkan B. Akcaoz H, Fert C (2004a). Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy 29:39-51

Ozkan B, Kurklu A, Akcaoz H (2004b). An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioen-ergy 26:89-95

Pathak H, Wassmann R (2007). Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agricul-ture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems 94:807-825

Pishgar-Komleh SH, Ghahderijani M, Sefeedpari P (2012a). Energy consumption and CO2 emissions analysis of pota-to production based on different farm size levels in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 33:183-191

Pishgar-Komleh SH, Sefeedpari P, Ghahderijani M (2012b). Exploring energy consumption and CO2 emission of cot-ton production in Iran. Journal of Renewable and Sustain-able Energy 4:033115

Pishgar-Komleh SH, Omid M, Heidari MD (2013). On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province. En-ergy 59:63-71

Sami M, Reyhani H (2018). Energy and greenhouse gases balances of cotton farming in Iran: A case study. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 66(1):101-109

Semerci A, Baran MF, Gokdogan O, Celik AD (2019). De-termination of energy use efficiency of cotton production in Turkey: A Case Study From Hatay Province. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27(4):1829-1835

Sethi VP, Sharma SK (2007). Greenhouse heating and cooling using aquifer water. Energy 32:1414-21

Singh S, Singh S, Pannu CJS, Singh J (2000) Optimization of energy input for raising cotton crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion & Management 41:1851-1861

Singh JM (2002). On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Master of Science. In-ternational Institute of Management University of Flens-burg, Flensburg

Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM, Ranjan M (2003). Energy use pattern in production agriculture f a typical village in arid zone India: part II. Energy Conversion and Management 44:1053-1067

Tsatsarelis CA (1991). Energy requirements for cotton produc-tion in central Greece. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 50: 239-246

Unakıtan G, Hurma H, Yılmaz F (2010). An analysis of ener-gy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey. Energy 35:1-5

Yaldiz O, Ozturk HH, Zeren Y, Bascetincelik A (1993). Ener-gy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. 5th Inter-national Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agri-culture, İzmir, 11-14 October, 527-536 (in Turkish)

Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B (2005). An Analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Re-newable Energy 30:145-155

Zahedi M, Eshghizadeh HR, Mondani F (2014). Energy use efficiency and economical analysis in cotton production system in an arid region: A case study for Isfahan prov-ince, Iran. International Journal of Energy Economics Poli-cy 4(1):43-52.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.038

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.