Biochemical Effects of Drought Stress in Some Strawberry Cultivars

Mostafa Fraidoon Faaek Ali, Lütfi Pırlak, Metin Turan

Abstract


This research was 2016-2017 years of the Selcuk University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Horticulture Research and practice was carried out in the greenhouse. Study the Yalova Atatürk Central Horticultural Research Institute, Ata-77, Bolverim-77, Doruk-77, Dorukhan-77, Eren-77, Erenoğlu-77, and Hilal-77 strawberry varieties. After the planted strawberry seedlings reached the 5-6 leaf stage, after irrigation at field capacity, drought application was made until the plants lost their leaf turgor. After implementation of the varieties of drought with healing and drought period of watering again losses to determine.

In strawberry cultivars, significant decreases occurred in the amount of protein with the application of drought. In the recovery period after the drought, the protein amounts increased again. Drought treatment significantly increased proline content in all cultivars compared to control. Catalase enzyme activity in all strawberry cultivars increased significantly as a result of drought application in both years. There was a slight decrease in the recovery period. In both years of the study, drought application increased the peroxidase enzyme activity in all strawberry cultivars compared to the control, and a slight decrease occurred in the recovery period compared to the drought application. Drought application in cultivars increased the superoxide dismutase enzyme activity a little compared to the control, while the activity decreased to the control level during the recovery period.

Keywords


Strawberry; Biochemical properties; Drought; Stress

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbaspour H, Saeidi-Sar S, Afshari H, Abdel-Wahhab MA (2012). Tolerance of mycorrhiza infected pistachio (Pista-cia vera L.) seedling to drought stress under glasshouse conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology 169: 704 -709.

Agarwal A, Pandey R (2004). Antioxidant enzyme responses to NaCl stress in Cassia angustifolia. Biol Plant. 48:555-560.

Alizadeh A, Alizade V, Nassery L, Eivazi A (2011). Effect of drought stress on apple dwarf rootstocks. Technical Jour-nal of Engineering and Applied Science 1: 86-94.

Angelini R, Federico M (1989). Histochemical evidence of polyamine oxidation and generation of hydrogen peroxide in the cell wall. J. Plant Physiol. 135: 212-217.

Anonymous (2017). https://arastirma. tarim.gov.tr /yalovabahce/Menu/34/Meyveler, Date of access: 19.06.2021.

Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007). Roles of glycine betaine ve proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Envi-ronmental and Experimental Botany 59: 206-216.

Bates A, Waldren W, Teare A (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.

Behnamnia M, Kalantari KM, Rezanejad F (2009). Exogenous application of brassinosteroid alleviates drought-induced oxidative stress in Lycopersicon esculentum L. General and Applied Plant Physioiogy, 35: 22-34.

Bian YM, Chen SY, Xie MY (1988). Effects of HF on proline of some plants. Plant Physiol. Commun., 6: 19-21.

Bian S, Jiang Y. (2009). Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Scientia Horticulturae, 120: 264–270.

Bolat I, Dikilitas M, Ercisli S, Ikinci A, Tonkaz T (2014). The effect of water stress on some morphological, physiologi-cal, and biochemical characteristics and bud success on ap-ple and quince rootstocks. The Scientific World Journal, 1-8.

Bradford C (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quan-titation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Areproduction Research Laboratories, Department Of Biochemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA 942-951.

Brito G, Costa A, Fonseca H, Santos C (2003). Responses of Olea europea ssp. maderensis in vitro shoots exposed to osmotic stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 97: 411-417.

Caruso A, Chefdor F, Carpin S, Depierreux C, Delmotte FM, Kahlem GDM (2008). Physiological characterization and identification of genes differentially expressed in response to drought induced by PEG 6000 in Populus canadensis leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 165: 932-941.

Chai TT, Fadzillah NM, Kusnan M, Mahmood M (2005). Water stress-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant re-sponses in micropropagated banana plantlets. Biologia Plantarum, 49: 153-156.

Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S (1998). Antioxidant responses of rice seedling to salinity stress. Journal of Plant Science, 135: 1-9.

Ekmekçi M, Kalefetoğlu S (2005). The effect of drought on plants and tolerance mechanisms. G. U. Journal of Sci-ence, 18: 723-740.

FAO (2021).https://fao.org. Date of access: 19.08.2021

Geçer MK, Yilmaz H (2011). Van ekolojik koşullarında çilek fidesi üretim olanaklarının belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Ün-iversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21: 28-34.

Gong H, Zhu X, Chen K, Wang S, Zhang C (2005). Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Science, 169: 313-321.

Havir K, Mchale A (1987). Biochemical and developmental characterization of multiple forms of catalase in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology, 84: 1291-1294.

Ipek M, Pirlak L, Esitken A, Dönmez MF, Turan M, Sahin F (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in-crease yield, growth and nutrition of strawberry under high-calcareous soil conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37: 990-1015.

İpek M (2015). In vitro Şartlarda Garnem ve Myrobolan 29C Anaçlarının Kurak Stresine Karşı Tepkilerinin Belirlen-mesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi.

Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, So-masundaram R, Panneerselvam R (2009). Drought stress in plants: A review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11: 100–105.

Jones GH (1990). Physiological aspects of the control of water status in horticultural crops. HortScience, 25: 19-26.

Karimi S, Yadollahi A, Nazari-Moghadam R, Imani A, Arzani K (2012). In vitro screening of almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.)) genotypes for drought tolerance. J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 18: 263-270.

Kutlu N (2010). Tahıllarda kuraklık stresi. Türk Bilimsel Der-lemeler Dergisi, 3: 35-41.

Mahajan S, Tuteja N. (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses. Biochemistry and Biophysics, 444: 139-158.

Matysik J, Bhalu BA, Mohanty P (2002). Molecular mecha-nism of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Curr. Sci., 82: 525-532.

Millar AH, Mittova V, Kiddle G, Heazlewood JL, Bartoli C, Theodoulou FL (2003). Control of ascorbate synthesis by respiration and its implication for stress responses. Plant Physiology, 133: 443-447.

Monti LM. (1987). Breeding plants for drought resistance; the problem and its relevance, drought resistance in Plants. Meeting Held in Amalfi, Belgium, 1-8.

Moussa HR, Abdel-Aziz SM (2008). Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 1: 31-36.

Mundree SG, Baker B, Mowla S, Peters S, Marais S, Willigen CV, Govender K, Maredza A, Muyanga S, Farrant JM, Thomson JA (2002). Physiological and molecular insights into drought tolerance, African Journal of Biotechnology, 1:23-38

Özcan S, Babaoğlu M, Gürel E (2004). Bitki Biyoteknolojisi Genetik Mühendisliği ve Uygulamaları. Selçuk Üniversi-tesi Vakfı Yayınları, Konya.

Özfidan C (2010). Ekzojen ABA Uygulamasının Kuraklık Stresi (PEG-6000) Altındaki Yabani ve ABA-eksik Ara-bidopsis Mutantları Üzerindeki Biyokimyasal Ve Fizy-olojik Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.

Patel PK, Hemantaranjan A, Sharma BK, Singh R (2011). Growth and antioxidant system under drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as sustained by salicylic acid, Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 7: 130-144.

Rahman SML, Mackay AW, Quebedeaux B, Nawata E, Sa-kuratani T, Mesbahuddin ASM (2002). Superoxide dis-mutase activity, leaf water potential, relative water content, growth and yield of a drought-tolerant and a drought-sensitive tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars, Subtropical Plant Science, 54: 16-22.

Reddy AR., Chaitanya KV, Jutur PP, Sumithra K (2004). Differential antioxidative responses to water stress among five mulberry (Morus alba L.) cultivars, Environ. Exp. Bot., 52: 33-42.

Rostami AA, Rahemi M (2013). Responses of capri fig geno-types to water stress and recovery, J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 7: 131-139.

Sairam RK, Srivastava GC (2000). Induction of oxidative stress and antioxidant activity by hydrogen peroxide treat-ment in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes, Biologia Plantarum, 43: 381-386.

Sharma S, Dubey RS (2005). Drought induces oxidative stress and enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes in grow-ing rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 46: 209-221.

Sircelj H, Tausz M, Grill D, Batic F (2007). Detecting differ-ent levels of drought stress in apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) with selected biochemical and physiological pa-rameters, Scientia Horticulturae, 113: 362-369.

Sivritepe N, Erturk U, Yerlikaya C, Turkan I, Bor M, Ozdemir F (2008). Response of the cherry rootstock to water stress induced in vitro, Biologia Plantarum, 52: 573-576.

Tanaka K, Masuda R, Sugimoto T, Omasa K (1990). Water deficiency-induced changes in the contents of defensive substances against active oxygen in spinach leaves, Agri-cultural and Biological Chemistry, 54: 2629-2634.

Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003). Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genet-ic engineering for stress tolerance, Planta, 218: 1-14.

Yediyıldız AG (2008). Kuraklık ve Tuz Stresi Uygulanan Buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) Çeşitlerinde Antioksidant Enzim Aktivitesindeki Değişimlerin Belirlenmesi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

Zanjani KE, Rad AHS, Naeemi M, Aghdam AM, Taherkhani T (20129. Effects of zeolite and selenium application on some physiological traits and oil 126 yield of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) under drought stress. Cur-rent Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4: 462-470.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.046

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.