Determination of Forage Yield and Some Quality Characteristics of Silage Sorghum Genotypes at Different Water Stress Levels

Ramazan Çağatay Arıcı, Mehmet Ali Avcı

Abstract


The study was conducted in order to determine the forage yield and some quality characteristics of silage sorghum genotypes at different water stress levels in the Randomized Complete Block Design arranged in split plots under Konya ecological conditions in 2020.

Three irrigation treatments (I1: Full irrigation; I2: 75% of I1; I3: 50% of I1) and 14 silage sorghum genotypes supplied from other countries were used in this study, irrigation subjects formed the main parcels and the genotypes sub-plots. In the study, the lowest and highest values were; 4756 kg da-1 (I3)-6757 kg da-1 (I1) for green herbage yield; 1149 kg da-1 (I3)-2002 kg da-1 (I1) for dry matter yield, 8,1 % (I1)-9,6% (I2) for crude protein, 33.3% (I2)- 34.5% (I1) for ADF ratio, 55% (I3)- 58.4% (I2) for NDF ratio and and cellulose ratio was determined as 25.6% (I3)-28.2% (I1) respectively. The genotypes used in the study, in which the efficiency of irrigation water use efficiency increased as water stress increased, the lowest and highest dry matter yields were obtained from genotypes G-11 (4214 kg da-1) and G-4 (6961 kg da-1), respectively, while a total of 8 genotypes had higher green herbage yield values than the study average


Keywords


Climate change Drought Water stress Forage crops Sorghum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonim (2020). Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Klimatoloji Şube Müdürlüğü Kalaba, Ankara, Türkiye.

Anonymous (2009). Approved methodologies, www.leco.com/resources/approved_methods.

Aydinşakir K, Dinç N, Büyüktaş D, Erdurmus C, Bayram E (2018). Yüzeyaltı ve Yüzeyüstü Damla Sulama Sistemiyle Sulanan Sorgumun Sulama Programının Oluşturulması, TÜBİTAK Program Kodu: 1001 Proje No: 116 O 262.

Bean B, Mccollum T, Pietsch D, Rowland M, Porter B, Vanmeter R (2002). Texas Panhandle Forage Sorghum Silage Trial. The Agriculture Program of Texas A&M University System.

Canyiğit M, Okant M (2018). Bitki Aktivatörünün Sorgum-Sudan Otu Melezi Farklı Uygulamalarının Verim ve Verim Unsurlarına Etkisi, ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2 (1), 1-9.

Chakravarthi M K, Reddy YR, Rao K S, Ravi A, Punyakumari B, Ekambaram B (2017). A study on nutritive value and chemical composition of sorghum fodder, Int J Sci Environ Technol, 6, 104-109.

Cotton J, Burow G, Martinez V A, Kucera J M (2013). Biomass and Cellulosic Ethanol Production of Forage Sorghum Under Limited Water Conditions. Bioenerg. Res. 6:711–718

Dahmardeh K, Rad M R P, Rad M, Hadizadeh M (2015). Effects of potassium rates and irrigation regimes on yield of forage sorghum in arid regions, International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 6 (4), 207-212.

Gonulal E (2020). Performance of sorghumxsudan grass hybrıd (Sorghum bicolor L.× Sorhgum sudanense) cultıvars under water stress condıtıons of arıd and semı-arıd regıons.

House L (1985) A guide to sorghum breeding. ICRISAT Patanchru, AP India.

Howell T, Evett S, Tolk J, Copeland K, Colaizzi P, Gowda P (2008) Evapotranspiration of corn and forage sorghum for silage, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008: Ahupua'A, 1-14.

Howell T A, Cuenca RH, Solomon K H (1990). Crop yield response. "Manegement of farm irrigation systems, Edit. G.J. Hoffman., T.A. Howell., K.H. Solomon." Chap. 5. An ASAE Monograph, s. 93-116.

Islam MR, Garcia S C, Horadagoda A (2012). Effects of irrigation and rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter yield proportions of plant fractions of maize and nutritive value and in vitro gas production characteristics f whole crop maize silage. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 172:125-135

Jahansouz R M, Afshar R K, Heidari A, Hashemi, M (2014). Evaluation of Yield and Quality of Sorghum and Millet as Alternative Forage Crops to Corn under Normal and Deficit Iriigation Regimes. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume 10 (10): 699-715.

Kapluhan E (2013). Türkiye’de kuraklik ve kurakliğin tarima etkisi, Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi (27).

Kara M (2011). Sulama ve sulama tesisleri (II.Baskı), Selçuk Üniversitesi Basımevi, p.

Keten M (2020). Kısıntılı sulama koşullarında bitki stres indeksleri kullanılarak silajlık mısır ve sorgum bitkilerinin su-verim ilişkilerinin belirlenmesi. Doktora tezi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü imam Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü

Keten M, Değirmenci H (2020). Farklı Sulama Seviyeleri Altında Yetiştirilen İkinci Ürün Silajlık Mısır ve Sorgum Bitkilerinin Yaprak Su Potansiyellerinin Karşılaştırılması, ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (4), 865-874.

Khaton M A, Sagar A, Tajkia J E, Islam M S, Mahmud M S, Hossain A K M Z (2016). Effect of moisture stress on morphological and yield attributes of four sorghum varieties Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 265-271.

Kır H, Şahan B D (2019). Yield and Quality Feature of Some Silage Sorghum and Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Cultivars in Ecological Conditions of Kırşehir Province.

Kimbrough E L (1990). Corn and Sorghum for Silage, Cooperative Extension Service, Mississippi State University, p.

Kiziloglu M F, Sahin U, Kuslu Y, Tunc T (2009). Determining water-yield relationship, water

use effîciency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrig Sci.

:129-137.

Liu L, Maier A, Klocke N, Yan S, Rogers D, Tesso T, Wang D (2013). Impact of Deficit Irrigation on Sorghum Physical and Chemical Properties and Ethanol Yield. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Vol. 56(4): 1541-1549.

Mülayim M, Özköse A, Işık Ş (2009). Konya koşullarında sorgum x sudanotu melezi çeşitlerinde verim ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerin belirlenmesi, Türkiye VIII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Bildirileri, 2, 627-630.

Özmen S (2017). Bingöl Koşullarında Farklı Sorgum Türlerinin Ot Verimi Ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi, Bingöl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri EnstitüsüYüksek Lisans Tezi, 76s.

Pedersen JF, K P Vogel, D L Funnell (2005). Impact of reduced lignin on plant fitness. Crop Science. p. 812–819.

Saghafi A, Zand B, Nasri M, Jaberiaghdam M (2013). Study of water use efficiency on yield and yield components on cultivars of corn, sorghum and millet in Varamin region, Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3 (23), 3395-3398.

Sanderson M, Jones R, Ward J, Wolfe R (1992). Silage sorghum performance trial at Stephenville [Forage Research in Texas, Report PR-5018], Stephenville: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Soylu S, Sade B, Öğüt H, Akınerdem F, Babaoğlu M, Ada R, Eryılmaz T, Öztürk Ö, Oğuz H (2010). “Türkiye için Alternatif Bir Biyoyakit ve silaj Bitkisi Olarak Dallı Darının (Panicum virgatum L. ) Yetiştirilebilme Olanaklarının Araştırılması”. TÜBİTAK, TOVAG-107 O 161 Sonuç Raporu.

TÜİK (2017) TÜRKİYE İSTATİSTİK KURUMU.

Uzun F, Garipoğlu A, Ocak N (2017). Water use efficiency, yield, and nutritional quality of maize and sorghum cultivars as influenced by irrigation in a shallow soil. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 32 (3), 358-366

Van Soest P J (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.--p. 3583-3597, En: Journal of Dairy Science.--Vol. 74, no. 10 (Oct. 1991).

Van Soest P J (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2nd Ed.). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Wani P S, Albrizio R, Rao NV (2012). Crop Yield response to Water: FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Food And Agrıculture Organızatıon Of The Unıted Natıons. Rome, 66.

WEF (2011). (World Economic Forum)Global Risks 2011: Sixth Edition. Geneva, http://riskreport.weforum.org/global-risks-2011.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.